@lidja @lyndakelly61 @futureofmuseums @creativemerc @museum_flavor pLz look http://tinyurl.com/qxlja4 &here http://bit.ly/q1mhV assoc./conf. grpthink @RichardMcCoy @DanielCull very import.
As part of the Magnes WINDOWS series , the latest installation is by Israeli-born, Berkeley-living artist Naomie Kremer . The WINDOWS series was launched to use the Magnes new facility to positive effect, namely as public art to be viewed at night: to bring more cultural content to downtown Berkeley and in the evenings when the street traffic is less -- to light up the night. Kremer's opening was this evening and we had a really nice turn out, including important local patrons of the arts, collectors etc. Here pictured are Jeff and Jane Green , Penny Cooper (one of the Bay Area's finest collections, focused primarily on women artists with her wife Rena Rosenwasser ). Here Naomie introduces her video piece on Bluebeard's Castle, by Bela Bartok .
Comments
Memberhisp is the priviledge of belonging and supporting not only an important cause but one that is reaching a wider audience because of the noew, more open paradigm.
museums are facing the EXACT same issue right now. ALL my ideas are stolen from Max Anderson.
A Professional conference experience usually = a power point presentation.
A museum experience usually = a direct interaction with cultural property.
I think the reasons to be involved in these 2 things are very different.
But, in terms of a museum's engagement with an online community, then there's a kind of similarity.
Perhaps you mean more broadly "membership" in a museum. Then there are also some similarities ... Belonging to a group that is sponsoring a cause and getting some financial kick-backs for doing it.
Your mention of the BK's 1stFans project is interesting because this is a way to provide a unique experience, for a fee. Which is what many museums do anyway. I think that's totally fine and I am a 1stFan.
Also a member of my local zoo, and other Indiana-based cultural institutions.
I think I've lost my sense of direction here, though ... getting late for this old man. But I can't leave without asking who your picture is on twitter?
And I think we need to celebrate now the innate value - the gathering, the in-person exchange. I suggest happenings.
the twitter photo is Billy Jack, crusader for justice from 70s.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Billy_Jack
Here's 4 ideas for a New York Times Membership program, if they go that route as detailed in this Observer article: http://tr.im/lsjq
1. Sulzberger, Bill Keller, Jill Abramson twitter feeds that only Members can access. Hey, it works with the @1stfans Twitter Art Feed!
2. Members-only access to Flickr pool with all NYT-published photographs for that month. Photogs don't care b/c they're up for 4 weeks only.
3. Times Talks podcasts with two writers covering the same area. Just straight conversation (dance, art, dining, fashion, technology, etc.)
4. Access to website chats once a day, every day for a half hour with a writer whose byline appears on page 1 that day.
Of course they could be doing half of these things already, but those seem to me to be benefits that people would pay for, esp at a low $/yr
(source: http://twitter.com/WillCary 5/15/2009)
I'd love to see at westmuse.wordpress.com. I mean we are already advertising wordpress, right?
would like to pose to board after blog up for a while. ads in newsletter is exact same thing.
individual and institutional ads might be perk of membership?
Conferences serve several very important functions such as: Networking and Sharing Information (papers)... increasingly these kinds of things can be undertaken cheaper and more efficiently online... so to my mind this is great not because it means the end of conferences, but, because it means conferences can get rid of "the boring bits" and can become something else, something new... something as yet unknown.
Perhaps... massive 'think tanks', informal data sharing sessions, brainstorming gatherings, mass advocacy days, public outreach days (each one, teach one), and so much more.
We could start to think of conferences not as something that happens in dark conference room of some hotel, but, that is just the gathering point for us to "do" something.
Cheers, Dan
However, sharing mutual experiences, laughs with copious quantities of good wine cannot be replicated online (hence my suffering today!).
However as Ross Dawson's blog piece points out: "... the role of blogging and Twittering at events [is] something that event organizers must understand and work with effectively to add value to conferences. Beth also spoke about the role of online community building before, during and after events. This is about combining the rich value of face-to-face interaction with the potential of online discussions."
Apologies for the ridiculously run-on sentences.
"Museum 2.0 isn't abt tech; it's abt dropping barriers. A curator lunching w/ visitors is doing better 2.0 than is a static FB page"
I think he's got something here. And, if that's true, then we might conclude that conferences are very 2.0 communications tools. As others have said, conferences provide museum professionals with what Mr. Anderson might call a "visceral" connection to their peers and industry, whether its via commiseration, vindication and/or co-education. So I don't see them vanishing in the near future. (Also, it has to do with levels of technological comfort: Lydia, you mentioned regional associations going all digital. I can name at least one regional association whose members vehemently opposed an electronic newsletter because they couldn't bear to part with paper...)
But, yes, we need to re-evaluate the process and the product(s). I can think of several conferences for museum professionals that will be conducted this year in almost the exact same fashion as they were 10 (and probably 20) years ago. We love to talk about "added value" -- it's time to add more value to our get-togethers, surpass PowerPoint, and make something new. I heard good things (generally) about this year's Museums and the Web "unconference" sessions. At least a new idea was introduced and given its day in court.
Finally, I must add a note on something Allyson Lazar has developed at several conferences: the Reigstrar's Brigade. At each annual meeting, collections management folks converge on a local organization in need of trained personnel and volunteer their services to organize/store/pack/unpack/condition report/tag/etc. a group of objects. Talk about adding value to the conference and getting past PowerPoint. (Allyson can tell you more about this great program.) My point: what if we could find ways to tackle other concrete problems while in conference gangs?
All I did was introduce the concept (already in place in other regions) to the Western Region annual meetings.
And now I must make a plug: all you registration and collections folks in the Western Region, please join us on October 24 in San Diego when we will be helping out a museum (most likely the San Diego Air and Space Museum) with assorted collections projects. It will be a great opportunity to hang out with colleagues, help out a museum and eat free food!