Skip to main content

Right Place? Right Time?


O.K. I’m in fund development. It’s what I do, and so, since the arts & culture communities in the United States rely on the work that volunteers and fundraisers do, we all need to be realistic. And its helpful to be positive.

Like Pedro says in Napolean Dynamite, "If you vote for me all of your wildest dreams will come true."

I have been a little overwhelmed of recent how there are several quiet-ish, positive indicators out there that the economy might just be taking off. The NY Times reports…quietly?...(a little low-key, just on the cover of the business page) that the nation may be on the brink of a nineties-style expansion.

And the San Francisco Chronicle headlines “Robust economy forecast."

What’s this all about? Are these unmanned drones that are being sent out to spy upon and placate unsuspecting media readers?

Then there’s an article in today’s Chron that says, “…people must take initiative and do it themselves,” adding that "Each generation must discover its mission,” quoting Eddie Glaude Jr.

MAKE A DIFFERENCE. THE MONEY'S AVAILABLE. YOU ARE RESPONSIBLE. MAKE A DIFFERENCE.

Is it a new age? Are we on the brink of something big?

Will stalled war, an accelerating economy and a necessary political push for new protocols – whether “democrat” or Republican – welcome a new apprehension for leadership in the U.S.? Am I, all of a sudden, in the really right place at the really right time?

O.K. And the other thing I want to know is – Why was Night at the Museum the 50th best box office draw in movies since the history of tracking box office draw in movies, grossing $233,295,750 on December 22, 2006?

I still ain't seen it yet. It had Adam Sandler, or maybe Ben Stiller and Robin Williams or something…but when did this nation want to get behind the scenes of a museum so bad? And how did this movie, too, go sorta under-the-radar, in terms of success?


OMG. Do I trust these indicators? Do they qualify? Together do they mean that, within the rubric of my life -- to work in a museum provides a good service that people want, to take responsibility for working effectively with others to achieve success and to be confident that the financial resources will be available are a series of reasonable assumptions?

I'm comin' up with a five-year plan, man. And it don't look so bad.

Comments

Anonymous said…
Man, you are prolific with your blogging.... all I can say is, make a five year plan, but remember what happened to Stalin and Mao.
loveitallabove said…
therein the maybe ironic reference...was it one step forward two steps back?? or was that lenin?

jus' tryin' to stay the course, but wachout we don't maybe break new ground working all together in downtown Berkeley -- changing the profile, bringing back a new and overdue energy and real estate investment...anchored by this wonderfully singular Jewish museum -- whatever that means...

me, i'm psyched for all this promise. tho there's a thin line between inspiration and delusion...

Popular posts from this blog

Naomie Kremer's Ghosts

As part of the Magnes WINDOWS series , the latest installation is by Israeli-born, Berkeley-living artist Naomie Kremer . The WINDOWS series was launched to use the Magnes new facility to positive effect, namely as public art to be viewed at night: to bring more cultural content to downtown Berkeley and in the evenings when the street traffic is less -- to light up the night. Kremer's opening was this evening and we had a really nice turn out, including important local patrons of the arts, collectors etc. Here pictured are Jeff and Jane Green , Penny Cooper (one of the Bay Area's finest collections, focused primarily on women artists with her wife Rena Rosenwasser ). Here Naomie introduces her video piece on Bluebeard's Castle, by Bela Bartok .

Why Go to A Conference Anyways?

@lidja @lyndakelly61 @futureofmuseums @creativemerc @museum_flavor pLz look http://tinyurl.com/qxlja4 &here http://bit.ly/q1mhV assoc./conf. grpthink @RichardMcCoy @DanielCull very import.

Review: Macbeth

Macbeth by William Shakespeare My rating: 4 of 5 stars Four and a half stars, with one major flaw: the producers chose to do this funny little trick of overlaying Cumming's voices when he was multiple characters, namely three weird sisters when they spoke at once. The result was echo-y and distracting. Otherwise, the whole thing felt like the smartest guy in the neighborhood inviting you over to listen to him read, and you cared: knew the story and really wanted to hear how he delivered. It was intimate and rewarding. It also made me think about how it is a story of Scots and English. View all my reviews