Skip to main content

Warhol Live

Last Saturday Karen, Li’l E and I went to the de Young to see the Warhol Live.

We’d just been a couple of weeks ago to see the Warhol Prints down in San Jose.

Recently there was an exhibition of Warhol’s Jews at the Contemporary Jewish Museum. That one seemed to miss the mark, according to the San Francisco Chronicle's Ken Baker:
The exhibition title "Warhol's Jews" grates on my ears by its proprietary ring. Granted the title derives from an ensemble of Andy Warhol's works, but it seems to give credence to the long-discredited notion of certain people belonging to others.

On the other hand The New York Times did a decent write up on Josh Kornbluth's "Warhol: Is It Good for the Jews?" monologue:

...Mr. Kornbluth didn’t attend a synagogue and never had a bar mitzvah. His mother spoke Yiddish, but culturally his family members identified more as Americans than as Jews. His father rejected his Jewish faith and taught his children about Marx, Engels and class struggle.

Mr. Kornbluth began pondering the themes of rejection, marginalization and ideological struggle in his own life. “I’ve been doing a kind of Jewish 101 this last month,” he said. “I’d thought that because I’m not a religiously observant Jew, then I’m not a Jew...”

...And ultimately, Mr. Kornbluth said, the experience of thinking about the portraits gave him a greater appreciation of and curiosity about his Jewishness. The art validated him.

“What Andy Warhol has taught me is that I am a Jew,” Mr. Kornbluth concludes at the end of the show. For that, he says, he is in debt to the artist. “I guess you could say that I am a Warhol Jew,” he adds.


Hmm -- I was not a big fan of that display, but I got friends involved there and I wish them well...

The print show at San Jose was fantastic, a stop-you-in-your-tracks type terrific, at least in the first gallery where an early self-portrait and four flowers were so basic, primal, essential.

(I had never quite seen how much the four flowers looked like anuses. Dig it, Ms. O’Keefe.)

And the other cool thing was the Dipity station developed by Chris Alexander. (Please read Chris' beautiful story of technology in the San Jose Museum of Art by clicking here.)


The coolest thing about Warhol Live was how the exhibition captured the various media that made up Warhol’s oeuvre. When I got the end I realized the exhibition had been organized by the Montreal Museum of Fine Arts. Karen and I saw a Cocteau exhibition there that had, with equal success, taken on a remarkable personality, some illicit content and interaction of drawing, film and a sense of time and place, Cocteau’s circle and Warhol’s Factory.


In the middle of Warhol Live there was this trip out room -- a sofa, lights like out of a party for the Velvets. I was dancing around in a room designed for getting high in -- though no one was doing that -- with my 2 1/2 year old son chasing the psychedelic lights while I sang to Venus in Furs. Life goes on.


And Lynne and Marc Benioff were lead sponsors -- great to see them get into the fray.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Naomie Kremer's Ghosts

As part of the Magnes WINDOWS series , the latest installation is by Israeli-born, Berkeley-living artist Naomie Kremer . The WINDOWS series was launched to use the Magnes new facility to positive effect, namely as public art to be viewed at night: to bring more cultural content to downtown Berkeley and in the evenings when the street traffic is less -- to light up the night. Kremer's opening was this evening and we had a really nice turn out, including important local patrons of the arts, collectors etc. Here pictured are Jeff and Jane Green , Penny Cooper (one of the Bay Area's finest collections, focused primarily on women artists with her wife Rena Rosenwasser ). Here Naomie introduces her video piece on Bluebeard's Castle, by Bela Bartok .

Why Go to A Conference Anyways?

@lidja @lyndakelly61 @futureofmuseums @creativemerc @museum_flavor pLz look http://tinyurl.com/qxlja4 &here http://bit.ly/q1mhV assoc./conf. grpthink @RichardMcCoy @DanielCull very import.

Review: Macbeth

Macbeth by William Shakespeare My rating: 4 of 5 stars Four and a half stars, with one major flaw: the producers chose to do this funny little trick of overlaying Cumming's voices when he was multiple characters, namely three weird sisters when they spoke at once. The result was echo-y and distracting. Otherwise, the whole thing felt like the smartest guy in the neighborhood inviting you over to listen to him read, and you cared: knew the story and really wanted to hear how he delivered. It was intimate and rewarding. It also made me think about how it is a story of Scots and English. View all my reviews